Alaska Gateway School District
Meeting Date: 12/02/2013 - 4:00
Evaluation Committee Meeting #2
Location: Boardroom DO
Team Members in Attendance:
Dawn Buffum, Scott MacManus, Craig Roach, Tracie Wiesz
Guests in Attendance:
Sara Talus, Joyce Dunning
Action Taken:
1.Last meeting minutes reviewed and approved
2.Discussion of storage of information on web site. agsdteachereval.webly.com
a. Meeting minutes will be posted following approval by the group
b. Other items to be posted to the site will be posted following group approval
3.Committee Protocols/norms
a. Norms for the meeting: Cell phones on vibrate
Group check-in following each topic discussion
Each person needs to participate
Be on-time
Agenda will be out on Monday afternoon before the meeting
We will work toward consensus on all items through discussion, if a consensus can't be reached then the issue will be settled via a vote.
4.Committee Scope of Work: We are creating a comprehensive evaluation tool that aligns with the Alaska State Standards, incorporates Cultural standards, is based on accepted tools such as Marzano or Danielson, and incorporates from 2 - 4 student evaluation tools.
1. We have to identify which model we choose.
2. We will keep the foundation of the original Evaluation Document and build off of it.
Scope: Will we use the multi-year planning template from EED for our committee pacing? Suggestion: everyone needs to look at the multi-year planning template.
3. Suggestion: have a representative from EED meet with us during the next meeting to clarify the following issues.
a. What is growth?
b. What is the scope of the Metrix: Do they apply to all students, or the teacher's progress? Or is it the same?
Or are they to be set by site administrators and teachers?
c. Is the metrix the student or the teacher -- based on student by student vs. total class
d. How does this work in with the percentage of the student evaluation applied to the teachers evaluation
Traci will forward everyone information on Danielson and Marzano--This is posted on the website
Question: Stakeholders and how do they fit into this process?
Next meeting: a. Review Multi-year timeline sample
b. We may need to review Marzano and Danielson to make sure that everyone is on the same page
c. Elements of Evaluation
Adjourned Time:
5:30
Next Meeting Date:
12/18/2013
Next Meeting Time:
4:00
Next Meet Title:
Evaluation Committee Meeting #3
Meeting Date: 12/02/2013 - 4:00
Evaluation Committee Meeting #2
Location: Boardroom DO
Team Members in Attendance:
Dawn Buffum, Scott MacManus, Craig Roach, Tracie Wiesz
Guests in Attendance:
Sara Talus, Joyce Dunning
Action Taken:
1.Last meeting minutes reviewed and approved
2.Discussion of storage of information on web site. agsdteachereval.webly.com
a. Meeting minutes will be posted following approval by the group
b. Other items to be posted to the site will be posted following group approval
3.Committee Protocols/norms
a. Norms for the meeting: Cell phones on vibrate
Group check-in following each topic discussion
Each person needs to participate
Be on-time
Agenda will be out on Monday afternoon before the meeting
We will work toward consensus on all items through discussion, if a consensus can't be reached then the issue will be settled via a vote.
4.Committee Scope of Work: We are creating a comprehensive evaluation tool that aligns with the Alaska State Standards, incorporates Cultural standards, is based on accepted tools such as Marzano or Danielson, and incorporates from 2 - 4 student evaluation tools.
1. We have to identify which model we choose.
2. We will keep the foundation of the original Evaluation Document and build off of it.
Scope: Will we use the multi-year planning template from EED for our committee pacing? Suggestion: everyone needs to look at the multi-year planning template.
3. Suggestion: have a representative from EED meet with us during the next meeting to clarify the following issues.
a. What is growth?
b. What is the scope of the Metrix: Do they apply to all students, or the teacher's progress? Or is it the same?
Or are they to be set by site administrators and teachers?
c. Is the metrix the student or the teacher -- based on student by student vs. total class
d. How does this work in with the percentage of the student evaluation applied to the teachers evaluation
Traci will forward everyone information on Danielson and Marzano--This is posted on the website
Question: Stakeholders and how do they fit into this process?
Next meeting: a. Review Multi-year timeline sample
b. We may need to review Marzano and Danielson to make sure that everyone is on the same page
c. Elements of Evaluation
Adjourned Time:
5:30
Next Meeting Date:
12/18/2013
Next Meeting Time:
4:00
Next Meet Title:
Evaluation Committee Meeting #3